Skip to main content

USA loses its way?

 The USA under Trump is losing ground to China on, amongst other things, renewable energy. China is investing heavily in it, Trump is trying to stop it, onshore and offshore wind especially. It all adds up to what some see as fatal energy policy error, with the US trapped into a dead-end commitment to fossil fuels, destined to lead to ever rising energy and climate costs, with the war on Iran possibly being seen by future historians as a key part in a process of US decline.

By contrast, China is now leading the way on low cost green energy deployment, and also on new energy tech R&D.  For example, it now leads on solar research – actually aided by Trump.  Collaboration on PV research with the US did significantly decreased after the 2018 ‘China Initiative’ launched by the Trump administration. But there has been a compensatory acceleration of collaborations between China & other countries, particularly with S. Korea and Germany. And now there are more impactful articles authored by China in prestigious journals, indicating growing autonomy in   PV solar R&D. 

China does still use a lot of coal, but it is trying to cut back on emissions. It is still building some new coal plants but they are sometimes portrayed as an interim flexibility option- helping to balance renewables, with some coal plants only being used occasionally when green power is less available. But that’s just for now. Key targets in a new plan include cutting overall carbon intensity by more than 65% by 2030, compared to 2005 levels, ‘reasonably’ controlling coal-fired power generation, achieving a ‘25% share of non-fossil energy consumption by 2030’ and ‘gradually’ covering all new power demand with clean energy. 

So, although it may take time, China may come out as a major ‘green energy’ winner, also successfully pushing its green tech in many locations around the world. While the US is looking increasing like the looser. It certainly has lost whatever credibility it had in terms of climate policy and also, arguably, its image as a defender of positive futures. However, all may not be totally lost. There is some resistance to Trumps green blocks to wind and solar, and Trump may not survive the economic and political mess created by the war on Iran. But, for the moment, it looks pretty grim, with fuel cost impacts spreading and the USA (and elsewhere) and the US and Iran being the only major emitters without zero emission targets. Indeed, Trump had backed out of all climate action related agreements, including a recent one backed by 141 countries. Instead, ‘drill baby drill’ is his motto..

That sounds like a dead end, historically. But it’s also worth asking, will China’s version of autocratic-communism-combined-with-markets survive?  And can it deliver a green future? It does seem to be trying. And a Chinese commentator has claimed that ‘its rise in renewable energy is not just a tale of emissions, geopolitical power & economic security; it is a shift towards sustainable development, clean transition and inclusion. As the global energy order expands, China’s role as an architect of green technology will only become more central.’ 

Well maybe.  But here is what Karl Marx had to say in 1859: ‘No social order ever disappears before all the productive forces for which there is room in it have been developed; and new higher relations of production never appear before the material conditions of their existence have matured in the womb of the old society itself’.  

Are we anywhere near ready for that? Probably not! It certainly did not prove to be the case for Russia. China may be doing better. Although Marx is hard going, with his relentlessly reductive determinism. Isn’t there room for some variation and flexibility?  And learning from mistakes?  The USA does have a huge high-tech military, but, apart from its occasional forays into space exploration and it’s push into AI, the US does seem to have abandoned much of its tech leadership role, in energy especially, and, under Trump, it is also tearing itself apart socially and politically.  Though it may yet pull back from disaster and change track. China may be doing a lot that’s right in energy terms (nuclear arguably apart), but it also has some (very) dirty washing in social terms. Europe may be a bit better on that, and, although China has much more installed renewable energy capacity than Europe (2.3TW versus 1TW) it is also still using a lot of coal, while Europe is getting almost 50% of its power from renewables, and its pushing ahead for more, with coal being phased out- totally in the UK. Though there are also plans for some more nuclear in some EU member countries and in the UK. 

However, who knows what will happen next politically? With the Iran war as yet unresolved,  energy policies around the world are still in flux, although it does seem clear that renewables will be one winner, come what may. But so may nuclear, and also coal, even if views differ on how much. Meanwhile, according to the IEA, global carbon dioxide emissions reached a record high last year, rising 0.4% from 2024 levels, due in part to the USA, where coal demand rose 10% last year. That doesn’t bode well for the future, although, as a GRIST article argued, developing economies in Asia, led by China, are going faster with their energy transitions in many ways than developed economies, so there is still hope…

What next?  Is a green future really possible? Based on growth? Few greens will object to growth in the use of renewables, but there can be local objections and it has to be done carefully. And, if you are a deep green, then reliance on continued, and indeed expanding, economic growth will be disastrous - there are eco-limits to earths carrying capacity and its material resources. Something Marx did actually note. But he felt it was not an immediate issue. Maybe now it is - we may be running out of time. And planet. 

Some major issues…Are we ready to face de-industrialisation? Though isn’t that what has happened in the USA?  And isn’t that what AI will lead to most places?  But with China winning on that too - aided by solar? Or, as some see it, is AI the horribly flawed work of the devil? Plenty of big issues to discuss…


Comments

  1. US DoD backlash https://renewablesnow.com/news/us-clean-energy-groups-sue-pentagon-over-wind-review-freeze-1295832/

    ReplyDelete
  2. https://electrek.co/2026/06/02/new-york-sues-over-interior-dept-s-1b-bribe-to-an-oil-company-stop-wind-power/

    ReplyDelete
  3. https://www.climatechangenews.com/2026/06/04/chinas-carbon-emissions-rise-again-as-more-clean-power-is-wasted/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The IEA set out a way ahead

The International Energy Agency's new Global Energy Roadmap sets a pathway to net zero carbon by 2050, with, by 2040, the global electricity sector reaching net-zero emissions. It wants no investment in new fossil fuel supply projects, and no further final investment decisions for new unabated coal plants. And by 2035, it calls for no sales of new internal combustion engine passenger cars. Instead it looks to ‘the immediate and massive deployment of all available clean and efficient energy technologies, combined with a major global push to accelerate innovation’.  The pathway calls for annual additions of solar PV to reach 630 GW by 2030, and those of wind power to reach 390 GW. All in, this is four times the record level set in 2020. By 2050 it wants about 24,000 GW of wind and solar to be in place. A major push to increase energy efficiency is also seen as essential, with the global rate of energy efficiency improvements averaging 4% a year through 2030, about three times the av...

Fusion- next steps for the UK

Nuclear fusion is being talked up as the next big energy thing- although it remains some way off and there are many technical and economic question marks. But Boris Johnson is evidently a fan. The UK government, keen to maintain headway in this field after the UK’s exit from Euratom, has set aside £222m for the development of new fusion technology.  It has also asked local authorities to nominate potential sites for a prototype fusion plant, based on the MAST Tokamak developed at Culham in Oxfordshire. The Atomic Energy Authority will assess the sites before making recommendation to the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. Candidate sites for the ‘Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production’ ( STEP ) project include Ratcliffe-on-Soar power station, Nottinghamshire and Aberthaw Power Station, near Barry, in Wales. With there being concerns about local job as coal plants close, new projects like this are obviously attractive, but the STEP programme is fairly ...

New energy policy for Burnham?

 The soon to be UK Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, is being portrayed as a ‘new broom’ that could, or might, adopt better polices in all areas. Well, what about the energy sector?   It’s in a mess, economically, driven by high fossil gas prices, with retail electricity prices at an all-time high, despite renewable energy doing well (65 GW so far) with its wholesale price mostly being low. It’s in a mess technologically, at risk of undermining the crucial next stage of its important renewables programme by diverting cash to support major high-cost nuclear and fossil carbon capture and storage projects.  Both of these programme involve multi-billion funding. The much delayed Hinkley Point nuclear plant may end up costing £40-50bn, inflation adjusted, when it finally gets completed, probably in 2030. Its follow-on project, Sizewell C, may not do much better, despite promises about learning from Hinkley, and despite the investment risks being met by a consumer levy.  ...