Skip to main content

An end of year whimsy

It’s that time of year when editors seem happy to let a few dubious stories through. Most of the media ran with this one on yet another nuclear fusion breakthrough- this one at the Lawrence Livermore labs in California, at the National Ignition Facility. Well, with the climate change threat looming, non-fossil energy is a big issue just now-  and its certainly cold out! So is help at hand? Well no, not for some time at least. And at unknown cost. Even if this laser based system, which was designed primarily for replicating the physics of H-bomb ignition, can be made to deliver energy on a large scale reliably and safely, it’s going to take a while- it’s a very long shot.

An equally familiar but arguably much more welcome newspaper article was this one on energy saving. As seems to be said almost every week now, saving energy saves money.  And it’s available now. But no one seems to notice. Energy conservation is just not sexy. Not like high tech fusion or  hydrogen- which also these days regularly gets star billing.  Well hydrogen may have some applications, but in a wide ranging critique, Michael Liebreich, BNEF founder, says not that many. It’s not the wonder-fuel it’s been billed as. He is not happy: ‘we are going to waste huge amounts of money on the wrong use cases for hydrogen and the wrong infrastructure in the wrong places’.

Few seem happy either about the proposed new coal mine in Cumbria, but support for solar farms seems to be missing in Tory UK, although, in the EU, there seems to be support for putting solar in space…What an odd world.  With Russia still calling many of the shots: according to a new Parliamentary Briefing Note, ‘it is currently the only country capable of commercially providing the more enriched fuel needed for Advanced Modular Reactors’, which some look to the replace the current type of nuclear technology.  

However, the POST briefing does also note that, in the UK, renewable’s share of electricity expanded from 3% to 39.6% between 2000 and 2021, so, if we continue to accelerate along that path, maybe we won’t need Russian help- or to see if Small/Advanced Modular Reactors will be any use. 

PWR-type SMRs have been much hyped of late, but, perhaps predictably, estimates for the expected cost of power from NuScale, the US SMR leader, have recently shot up by 60-70% to around $90-100/MWh. Most new renewables of course are heading the other way - to $50/MWh and below for PV solar and wind. You do have to add balancing costs, but they too should fall as storage technology improves (including the use of hydrogen) and we develop a more flexible power system. I know which I would  rather have near me- and it’s not mini nukes or any sort of nuclear, small or large. The latest BEIS survey seemed to suggest that most people in the UK feel the same as me about renewables- with 88% in favour. They were not asked about nuclear this time, but in the 2021 survey only 37% were in favour. 

Ah well, we will have to see what happens next. Meantime, seasons greetings to all…

   

 

Comments

  1. RenewDecember 18, 2022 at 4:52 PM

    What a difference a year makes! Hydrogen was talked-up a lot initially: https://renewextraweekly.blogspot.com/2022/01/green-hydrogen-global-revolution.html#comments But now BNEF's doubts about some aspects are looking significant...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Global Energy Outlooks - BP v Jacobson

The share of renewables in global primary energy may increase ‘from around 10% in 2019 to between 35-65% by 2050, driven by the improved cost competitiveness of renewables, together with the increasing prevalence of policies encouraging a shift to low-carbon energy’. So says BP in its latest Global Energy Outlook . It does see wind and solar accounting ‘for all or most of the growth in power generation’, but even at the top of the range quoted, it still falls a lot short of the renewable ‘100% of total energy’ scenarios that have been produced by some academics in recent years.  To fill the gap to zero net carbon, BP sees wide-scale use being made use of carbon capture technology, as well as some nuclear power. And it says ‘Natural declines in existing production sources mean there needs to be continuing upstream investment in oil and natural gas over the next 30 years’. You won’t find much support for these fossil and nuclear options in the scenarios produced by Stanford Universi...
2 comments
Read more

Renewables beat nuclear - even with full balancing included

A new Danish study comparing nuclear and renewable energy systems (RES) concludes that, although nuclear systems require less flexibility capacity than renewable-only systems, a renewable energy system is cheaper than a nuclear based system, even with full backup: it says ‘lower flexibility costs do not offset the high investment costs in nuclear energy’.  It’s based on a zero-carbon 2045 smart energy scenario for Denmark, although it says its conclusions are valid elsewhere given suitable adjustments for local conditions. ‘The high investment costs in nuclear power alongside cost for fuel and operation and maintenance more than tip the scale in favour of the Only Renewables scenario. The costs of investing in and operating the nuclear power plants are simply too high compared to Only Renewables scenario, even though more investment must be put into flexibility measures in the latter’.  In the Danish case, it says that ‘the scenario with high nuclear implementation is 1.2 bil...
Post a Comment
Read more

The IEA set out a way ahead

The International Energy Agency's new Global Energy Roadmap sets a pathway to net zero carbon by 2050, with, by 2040, the global electricity sector reaching net-zero emissions. It wants no investment in new fossil fuel supply projects, and no further final investment decisions for new unabated coal plants. And by 2035, it calls for no sales of new internal combustion engine passenger cars. Instead it looks to ‘the immediate and massive deployment of all available clean and efficient energy technologies, combined with a major global push to accelerate innovation’.  The pathway calls for annual additions of solar PV to reach 630 GW by 2030, and those of wind power to reach 390 GW. All in, this is four times the record level set in 2020. By 2050 it wants about 24,000 GW of wind and solar to be in place. A major push to increase energy efficiency is also seen as essential, with the global rate of energy efficiency improvements averaging 4% a year through 2030, about three times the av...
44 comments
Read more