With Climate
Change at the top of the agenda, the EU aims to be the first carbon neutral continent, working towards net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, with a new climate law being enacted soon. That’s taken some fighting for
and fiddling, given the opposition from heavy coal
users like Poland, but there’s a proposed Just Transition mechanism to help countries like that move to carbon neutrality, with nuclear excluded from support for this. So renewables
should boom even more.
Renewables have
certainly been doing well. Germany will soon get around half
of its power from renewables, Portugal is already at over 54%, Denmark near
60%, while Sweden is at 66% and Austria over 70%. By 2030 some of these countries
could be getting near 100% of their electricity from renewables and should also
be beginning to meet significant shares of their heat and transport needs using
renewables. Sweden already gets around 54% of all its energy from renewables,
Norway and Iceland are both at around 70%.
Many other European countries are also now moving ahead. For example, with its economy
evidently recovering, the new
centre-right government in Greece aims to generate 61% of its power from
renewables by 2030, with 7.7GW of solar & 7GW of wind capacity planned, up
from 2.7 & 3 GW now. Hydro is at 3.7GW. It aims to close all lignite plants
by 2028 and get 43% of its heating/cooling
and 19% of its transport needs from renewables by 2030.
After a long period of retrenchment in Spain, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s leftwing coalition government
has declared a ‘climate
emergency’ & pledged to transition to renewable energy ‘to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with the objective of reaching
climate neutrality by 2050’.
That is
not to say there are no problems, continued emissions from coal plants being
the most obvious, with, notably, Poland resisting change on that. Germany is
taking its time on its coal phase out too and France, still locked into
nuclear, is moving quite slowly on renewables. But longer term, most of the
countries in the EU have targets of getting to near 100% of power and in some
cases all energy from renewables by 2050.
That is certainly seen as possible in some recent scenarios – although the current official EU renewable
energy target is only 32% by 2030.
Coal remains a
problem for some EU countries, though politically its basically on the way out:
in a Eurobarometer public opinion survey 84%
agreed that more public financial support should be given to the transition to
clean energies with support for fossil fuel cut. A few EU countries are still keen on nuclear, and, although it is excluded
from access to the Just Transition fund,
it has been included
as an
allowed option
in the EU Sustainable
Finance Taxonomy, subject to ‘do no significant harm’
criteria, in particular with regards to the disposal of waste, and also
life-cycle considerations.
Although the UK is
now legally outside the EU, so it is no longer a rule maker, it will still be a
rule taker for a while: the various EU laws still apply to the UK during the
BREXIT transition process, set to run to the end of the year. Beyond that period
who knows, with the UK out of the EU single energy market, the
Emission Trading System and Euratom. The EU Green Deal also includes the idea
of Carbon Border taxes,
which may impact significantly
on power imports and exports. Access to funding for new EU-UK grid links may
also be limited. So there could be a problem
if, as planned, the UK manages to expand renewables beyond the current level of
supplying nearly 40% of power
to maybe 50%, while also expanding nuclear. At times it would have a lot of excess power
to export.
However, with
the UK and it problems no longer its direct concern, the European parliament is clearly keen to push the green deal and
wants even more, and faster action, so that the EU may retain it position as
one of the leaders in the field- and in renewables especially. It has not been
doing too badly on that. At the end of 2018 the EU had around 466 GW of
renewable capacity in place, 43 GW of that in the UK. Even leaving that part
out, it was well ahead of the USA, then at 245 GW. However, China was at 696
GW, well in the lead globally in capacity terms. Given its less developed grid
system, China has not been able to get good utilisation of all this capacity, an
issue which, along with funding constraints, has led to a slower pace of growth
recently, but it is still accelerating and the potential is vast: see my next
post.
The EU also
still has a large potential to tap. For example, it has been claimed that roof-top
solar PV could be expanded to supply around 25% of EU power, while the potential for on- shore wind has been put at 15TW,
nearly ten times current EU wind capacity, and it has been claimed there
are potential sites for even more. Given also the large potential, in some
locations, for offshore wind and other renewables large and small, the EU looks
well set to be a world leader, as long as it provides the necessary support for
these technologies to prosper.
The falling cost
of renewables will obviously help, but that also introduces problems in
competitive market systems - lower costs can mean lower profit potential and
less incentive to invest in new capacity. That, and the use of competitive
market auctions, has already meant that growth in renewables investment has
slowed in the EU. The need for balancing power is also an issue. Marginal cost
renewables can squeeze some gas plants out of peak markets, but we may need
these plants (perhaps using stored green gas), and other balancing systems, to
deal with lulls in renewable availability. So the market system needs to be
restructured to support the newly emerging flexible energy supply and demand
system.
EU renewables now at 35% of power , maybe 57% by 2030: https://sandbag.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Sandbag-European-Power-Sector-Review-2019.pdf
ReplyDelete