Skip to main content

Resource scarcity and Renewables

Some worry that there will be resource constraints on the expansion of renewables, with the emphasis often put on the large material requirements, e.g. for steel, aluminum and copper.  However, a full life-cycle resource analysis has suggested that renewables could supply the world’s entire electricity needs by mid-century without major problems with resource (materials) use or associated eco-impacts. It assessed the whole-life costs and materials souring impacts of solar, wind, hydro, in relation to the demand for aluminum, copper, nickel and steel, metallurgical grade silicon, flat glass, zinc and clinker. The overall conclusion was that ‘bulk material requirements appear manageable but not negligible compared with the current production rates for these materials. Copper is the only material covered in our analysis for which supply may be a concern’. Issues still remain for concrete, although there are lower carbon versions emerging.

Rare earths
There are however also concerns in relation to some other materials e.g. rare earth minerals used in power generator magnets (Neodymium) and lithium for batteries. Their use is certainly growing, although recycling of some of these materials can help and in some cases substitutes can be found, or systems redesigned to avoid or limit the need for these materials. It has also been argued that more efficient use of the scarce materials can help (evidently there is some wastage during production). The discovery of new reserves in a wider range of countries, and possibly also via sea-bed mining, should also help. Especially given that the main problem is often where the reserves are: that is a locational, commercial and geopolitical issue which ought to be resolvable. That’s what  IRENA says.  Even so there are some key issues of environmental justice and sustainability- mining minerals can be very invasive and involve significant health issues.

Water resources

Access to water resources could also be a major issue, possibly made worse by climate change. That is usually more of an issue for fossil and nuclear plants, which need large amount of water for cooling, but so do some renewable energy technologies, notably Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants. They use focused solar heat to create hot gases to drive turbines, much as with conventional plants.  To allow for efficient focusing, CSP plants have to be in areas with direct, non-diffuse solar, such as deserts, and water is one thing such areas do not have. Air cooling in an alternative option but is less efficient. More likely water will have to be piped in, which suggests that locations reasonable near the sea would be best- as in the North Africa.  Water is also needed for cleaning CSP mirrors and lenses and also for PV solar arrays, small or large. That will mount up in the years ahead. So will water use for biomass growing. Hydro plants also obviously need water and, with decreased rainfall in some areas in recent years, output from some hydro plants has fallen. In some parts of the world, droughts have meant that hydro outputs have become increasing unreliable. This is likely to get worse with climate change. 

Fossil fuel resources

In what may seem like another substantial concern, some fear that the diminishing fossil energy resources cannot support a transition to renewables. This even troubles some renewable supporters, one of whom said that renewables ‘currently require fossil fuels for their construction and deployment, so in effect they are functioning as a parasite on the back of the older energy infrastructure. The question is, can they survive the death of their host?’

It certainly could be argued that we should be reserving as much of whatever fossil energy is left as possible to support the process of building up renewable-based systems, rather than just burning it off for no long-term gain. It is also true that there are important non-energy uses for fossil resources, so some should be reserved for that too- although it may be that we will want to produce fewer plastics, given their ecosystem impacts. Using fossil fuel to build the renewables system will also lead to emissions debts and eco impacts. We will clearly want to limit that as much as possible. However, to some extent, the first wave of renewables can provide energy to support the next wave, in a self-sustaining breeding process. The energy returns on energy invested i.e. lifetime energy output in relation to required energy input, for most renewables are quite high (compared to current fossil fuel based system), so perhaps fossil fuel use for building the next wave of renewables can be progressively minimized, depending on how quickly the transition needs to be made. BECCS and/or other negative carbon options might help compensate for some of the emissions produced during the early stages of that process, though reafforestation might be a better bet.

Limits to growth

No one says the energy transition will be easy and we really do need to pay attention to resource issues. Certainly growth of the sort we have had so far cannot continue for ever for a range of reasons- there are limits. So we may need to rethink growth, although material and energy resource limitations are only part of that. We are not going to run out of solar energy, or sand for PV cells…but we may run out of space to put them on. It the same for wind and biomass. In the end land may be the scarcest long term resource, unless we can make use of marginal areas like deserts and also focus on offshore wind, wave and tidal stream power. There is a lot a sea and there are also a lot of desert areas. Its worth noting that the worlds deserts receive more energy from the sun in six hours than humankind uses in a year, while the total wind resource, including in the upper atmosphere, has been put at about 100 times more than the total current global primary power demand.


It also has to be said that whichever technological route forward we take we will need energy and materials to build the systems to replace the plants and systems we have now, as they become obsolete. Renewables are not notably much different in that respect from any other energy technology, and some may actually use less resources/kWh produced over their lifetimes, although there may be material resource limits to the use battery storage systems, including lithium Ion batteries for electric vehicles. We may need to rethink that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Renewables beat nuclear - even with full balancing included

A new Danish study comparing nuclear and renewable energy systems (RES) concludes that, although nuclear systems require less flexibility capacity than renewable-only systems, a renewable energy system is cheaper than a nuclear based system, even with full backup: it says ‘lower flexibility costs do not offset the high investment costs in nuclear energy’.  It’s based on a zero-carbon 2045 smart energy scenario for Denmark, although it says its conclusions are valid elsewhere given suitable adjustments for local conditions. ‘The high investment costs in nuclear power alongside cost for fuel and operation and maintenance more than tip the scale in favour of the Only Renewables scenario. The costs of investing in and operating the nuclear power plants are simply too high compared to Only Renewables scenario, even though more investment must be put into flexibility measures in the latter’.  In the Danish case, it says that ‘the scenario with high nuclear implementation is 1.2 bil...

The IEA set out a way ahead

The International Energy Agency's new Global Energy Roadmap sets a pathway to net zero carbon by 2050, with, by 2040, the global electricity sector reaching net-zero emissions. It wants no investment in new fossil fuel supply projects, and no further final investment decisions for new unabated coal plants. And by 2035, it calls for no sales of new internal combustion engine passenger cars. Instead it looks to ‘the immediate and massive deployment of all available clean and efficient energy technologies, combined with a major global push to accelerate innovation’.  The pathway calls for annual additions of solar PV to reach 630 GW by 2030, and those of wind power to reach 390 GW. All in, this is four times the record level set in 2020. By 2050 it wants about 24,000 GW of wind and solar to be in place. A major push to increase energy efficiency is also seen as essential, with the global rate of energy efficiency improvements averaging 4% a year through 2030, about three times the av...

Nuclear- not good vibrations in France

France is having problems with nuclear power.  It was once the poster child for nuclear energy, which, after a rapid government funded build-up in the1980s based on standard Westinghouse Pressurised-water Reactor (PWR) designs, at one point supplied around 75% of its power, with over 50 reactors running around the country. Mass deployment of similar designs meant that there were economies of scale and given that it was a state-run programme, the government could supply low-cost funding and power could be supplied to consumers relatively cheaply. But the plants are now getting old, and there has been a long running debate over what to do to replace them: it will be expensive given the changed energy market, with cheaper alternatives emerging. At one stage, after the Fukushima disaster in Japan in 2011, it was proposed by the socialist government to limit nuclear to supplying just 50% of French power by 2025, with renewables to be ramped up.  That began to look quite sensible wh...